Future of journalism debate: editors required

The debate over the future of media continues but one thing is for sure, it’s too soon to rip-up the editorial model.

The sheer volume of conversation taking place around the Iranian election result are cluttering up channels and making it impossible to hear voices that are coming directly from the country. On social networks from Flickr to Twitter messages of sympathy and support are generating huge volumes of noise.

Broadstuff’s Alan Patrick reckons that it’s a new type of spam

[…] a new type of spam is born, “whuffiespam” where the aim is to jump on to a good cause and get social capital by being visibly (and risibly) more caring than thou.

An editorial function would separate the signal from the noise and rate the integrity of the source. It would also stop the nonsense seen yesterday from HabitatUK which has hijacked popular Twitter tags with promotional spam.

Alan reckons that this is the Future of Twitterspam. Better get used to it – or overlay an editorial model.

Also posted on www.speedcommunications.com

Comments on this post

Add your comment

Your response to "Future of journalism debate: editors required":

Additional information

Because you are not logged in, we need you to complete the following additional fields.


Cancel button
  1. 1. At 9 Jul 2010 21:30, www.philipsheldrake.com linked here:

    ...Future of journalism debate: editors required...

Cite or link to this post  Add your comment

About the authors

Primary author
Stephen Waddington
Speed Communications

Contributors
Busy Body

Change feature settings

Choose a feature level and image for this post

Note: selecting homepage image will demote any exisiting homepage image to a homepage feature

Uploads should be PNG files measuring 337 x 138 pixels
Uploading file...   Click to cancel
Save button Cancel button

Post information

Posted 23 Jun 2009
Last edited 23 Jun 2009
Latest revision: 2


  • Stephen Waddington can edit
  • Anyone can comment

  • No communities